Biscuit_In_The_Basket

Moderator
  • Content count

    12,509
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

4 Neutral

About Biscuit_In_The_Basket

  • Rank
    Mohdoraitor
  • Birthday May 11

Profile Information

  • Location
    200 Level
  • Interests
    Hockey!

Recent Profile Visitors

7,494 profile views
  1. Been to QC and the surrounding area many, many times. My several words of French and their good English has been enough to not feel lost in translation.
  2. Gionota would be a solid pickup to booster the 3/4th lines and the PK
  3. Not just the boot, but the Islanders can opt out of the deal as well. Given how junky that arena is for hockey, I am not surprised that they are looking for a new home....especially since a bit to renovate elsewhere on Long Island was denied.
  4. According to the discussion on NHL radio network, the minimums are just that. Teams just need to go to the minimum on requirements and choose more if they want to. So while there are players eligible for exposure, teams only need to hit the minimum to be exposed.
  5. The Bobby Ryan who is out indefiniately?
  6. Extend Rosi to expose
  7. This is why conversation of exposure comes into play and how the Hawks can not only guide who the want Vegas to look at, but also who they need to expose that is under contract for next season. Signing someone like Mash will fill up an exposure requirement to help "protect" someone under contract that they do not want to expose. Player Exposure Requirements * All Clubs must meet the following minimum requirements regarding players exposed for selection in the Expansion Draft: i) One defenseman who is a) under contract in 2017-18 and played in 40 or more NHL games the prior season OR played in 70 or more NHL games in the prior two seasons. ii) Two forwards who are a) under contract in 2017-18 and played in 40 or more NHL games the prior season OR played in 70 or more NHL games in the prior two seasons. iii) One goaltender who is under contract in 2017-18 or will be a restricted free agent at the expiration of his current contract immediately prior to 2017-18. If the club elects to make a restricted free agent goaltender available in order to meet this requirement, that goaltender must have received his qualifying offer prior to the submission of the club's protected list. * Players with potential career-ending injuries who have missed more than the previous 60 consecutive games (or who otherwise have been confirmed to have a career-threatening injury) may not be used to satisfy a club's player exposure requirements, unless approval is received from the NHL. Such players also may be deemed exempt from selection by the League.
  8. https://www.nhl.com/news/nhl-expansion-draft-rules/c-281010592 Regulations Relating to Expansion Franchise * The Las Vegas franchise must select one player from each presently existing club for a total of 30 players (not including additional players who may be acquired as the result of violations of the Expansion Draft rules). * The Las Vegas franchise must select the following number of players at each position: 14 forwards, nine defensemen and three goaltenders. * The Las Vegas franchise must select a minimum of 20 players who are under contract for the 2017-18 season. * The Las Vegas franchise must select players with an aggregate Expansion Draft value that is between 60-100% of the prior season's upper limit for the salary cap.
  9. Well it is not Galaxy Trash, just trash
  10. Vegas can sign any FA just like any other team, except for the 48hr window, but they still have to "draft" 1 player from each team. The Hawks have the ability to guide them to the "best" choice from a Hawks perspective based on who they expose. Say the Hawks sign Mash for another year or three, and expose him and Kruger, the rest are trash....where might Vegas go with their pick from the Hawks? 🤔
  11. From what was discussed, the minimum is the pool that the team must expose and it is their choice as to who is in that minimum. Teams can choose to expose more than the minimum.
  12. It should have been reduced since the official messed up as well. Does not excuse what he Vermette did as that is to be an automatic suspension of 3 games, but I think the 5 is fair.
  13. One hopes so...but that seems like the norm...
  14. See my post on this page: This was based on conversation that was in the NHL radio network discussing impacts to certain team like the Hawks, and from those that have strong information on how the process works.
  15. Can play with the exposure requirements. Not everyone that can be exposed needs to be based on requirements I posted above