Jump to content
The Official Site of the Chicago Blackhawks


Full Member
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


crazyhawk last won the day on April 11 2013

crazyhawk had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

476 Excellent

About crazyhawk

  • Rank
    All Star

Profile Information

  • Location
    Wakefield, Quebec
  • Interests
    The great outdoors.
    Watching Hawk games.
    Humanity waking up.
  1. You Be The Gm

    I would think that this year especially Stan won't be trading away our 1st at the TD!
  2. You Be The Gm

    I would seriously consider Crow, (Sharp) & Bickell ( though I would think that is way too much salary for Edmonton 16 m! ) In return I would prefer the Penguins 1st round pick and Draisaitl + + some salary of course. I think Hall though a great player has some attitude issues and team chemistry is fickle thing.
  3. You Be The Gm

    Yeah 3 more years at 4.4, so if they ate 50% we would be in or 2.2 for 3 years and he is getting older .. could become Zeus ll ! Still it is a thought though … Vermette would be a great choice as he will walk at the end of the year .. only thing is there will be a bit of a bidding war for him and I don't want to see the Hawks lose any of their blue chip prospects for a rental .. even if that rental could help them win the Cup!
  4. You Be The Gm

    I would love for Stan to land another center .. I think we will be fine with our D, especially if TVR returns as good as new. TVR/Runblad/Rozy/Erixon are good for the 6/7 pairing. Now for a centre … I keep thinking of Lecavalier as someone who might gel well with the team. He would be reunited with Richards and would I believe play well in the shadow of Toews. He's a big body too which is most often a good thing. Problem is his cap hit .. at the deadline if Philly retains a good percentage and we move out someone like Rozy than maybe ... I also like Vermette but he will demand more in a trade I would think than Vinny. Thoughts?
  5. The Crawford Thread

    We have Bickell, Sharp, Crawford and perhaps Seabrook to look at as to who is to go … maybe two of them. If Bicks goes than the 2nd one would be tough to call … we have some depth though untested in goal .. Sharp would be hard to replace but he is getting up there and he still has demand … it's a toss up for me. Keep Seabs though!
  6. You Be The Gm

    I don't mind ripping. I would just like to have a big centreman on the team behind Toews. Not sure how Staal would work being 2nd fiddle to Toews and not being a captain etc. but he could be money .. at any rate I do believe we will need one more centreman in order to compete for the Cup! How to attain one remains the big question cause I don't want to see top prospects leaving like Pokka and TT.
  7. You Be The Gm

    No we can't really argue other than the potential need for a 3LC so that Shaw can go back to wing. There is also the reality that Richards may fall off as we move into the playoffs so another centre would be a good thing especially when matching up against Anaheim. TVR will be back by March and after a week or two of sheltered minutes should be good to handle his 4/5/6 role. I would say we are good on defense with our only need being that 2/3LC. Hanzal, Vermette … Eric Staal … Lecavalier?!! All would require salary moving out/salary retained so it will be tough. Vermette would be my first choice with Hanzal a close second. I do like the hail mary notion of a big centreman though like Staal or Lecavalier but they come with some big questions .. and big salary.
  8. You Be The Gm

    I heard he had an issue with his back. Not sure what it was exactly.
  9. You Be The Gm

    No drooling Creatch. Just that we do have some depth with dmen in case there is a need somewhere else … which apparently there is at 3LC.
  10. You Be The Gm

    I think Van would be happy to land any of 1st, 2nd or 3rd pairing dmen. Winnipeg too as mentioned!
  11. You Be The Gm

    Vancouver is in need of defensemen and we happen to have an abundance. I don't know if the Canucks have a center that would fit our needs. Matthias is a big, young center but would they move him for a prospect like Dahlbeck or Clendenning. Hanzal would be great though or Vermette.
  12. You Be The Gm

    If and it's a big if we could land Stewart along with say a Vermette and give up Bickell and a couple of prospects then that might be a good thing, especially if coming to the Hawks would ignite Stewart's previous ability to put the puck in the net with a good amount of snarl. It is a big if though and Bicks might still be the better of the two .. especially regarding team chemistry.
  13. You Be The Gm

    I don't know if I would want to trade Shaw to a conferance rival, I guess it's not as bad as a division rival but still. We would also miss Shaw's presence in the PO's as we don't have any sand paper other than him at this point. Hartman isn't quite there yet. Maybe a draft pick and a prospect would land Vermette. Toews, Richards, Vermette and Kruger would be nice center depth.
  14. The Crawford Thread

    All wins … no losses is all we need to know.
  15. You Be The Gm

    So this would mean you would be willing to trade Toews for say Winnipeg's 2015 & 2016 1st plus Ladd + Scheifele ( just for example! )?